project wing – Robohub

‘Tailsitter’ flying robot hovers and recovers easily thanks to new algorithm

Robin Ritz — Thu, 04 Jun 2015 20:10:04 +0000

Tailsitter in the Flying Machine Arena. Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

In August 2014 Google [x] announced that they had been secretly developing a drone delivery program to rival Amazon’s Prime Air. Called Project Wing, the system was based on a mechanically simple “tailsitter” design – a hybrid vehicle that takes off vertically like a multirotor but is also able to fly horizontally like a fixed-wing airplane. Following field tests, however, Google scrapped the design, saying that it was difficult to control and didn’t perform well in high winds. Since then, researchers at ETH Zurich have developed a new algorithm for robustly controlling a tailsitter flying machine in hover position. Using the algorithm, the tailsitter is able to recover from any orientation, including upside down. ETH has not yet demonstrated its algorithm in real-world conditions (e.g., high winds, GPS localization, different payload distributions). However, given the robustness of the solution shown in the video, perhaps Google should not dismiss the tailsitter design too quickly for its next design iteration.

– Robohub Editors

A tailsitter provides hover capability by pointing the nose and thrust direction upwards. For fast forward flight, the vehicle tilts to a near-horizontal orientation, resulting in efficient lift production due to the conventional wing design. Compared to other fixed-wing, hover-capable aircraft such as tiltrotors and tiltwings, the major advantage of a tailsitter is its mechanical simplicity: no mechanism for changing the direction of the propulsion system has to be added, saving weight and increasing reliability.

The algorithm demonstrated in the video is based on Optimal Control. Optimal trajectories for a set of initial orientations are precomputed and the corresponding initial desired body rates are stored in a small lookup table (500 entries). An outer control loop running at 50 Hz reads the desired body rates for the current orientation from the lookup table, and feeds them to an inner control loop. The inner control loop runs at 1000 Hz and tracks the desired body rates with the two propellers and the two flaps using feedback from a rate gyroscope. The resulting real-time computational complexity is extremely low.

Tailsitter’s propellers and motors. Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

The propellers are driven by brushless Hacker A05-13S motors that are attached to the wings by 3D-printed mountings. While the vehicle is hovering, it is crucial that a large part of the flaps are within the propeller-induced airstream, in order to keep the flaps effective and the system highly maneuverable. The motors are controlled by ZTW Spider 12A ESCs, which run custom SimonK firmware that enables a fast response to thrust set point changes. Since the custom SimonK firmware is tuned for the fastest possible response, the motor controllers get quite hot and are therefore placed in the propeller airstream for cooling.

Tailsitter’s underbelly. Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

Two radios are attached on the bottom side of the vehicle; a WiFly module for high-bandwidth telemetry, and a low-latency, frequency-hopping 2.4 GHz radio link that receives the control commands from the ground station. The total system latency including the motion capture system and the radio link is around 35 milliseconds.

Tailsitter’s flaps. Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

The flaps are actuated by MKS DS65K servos providing a fast response on flap angle changes. The flaps of the original frame are designed for fixed-wing forward flight and do not provide enough control authority for the hover flight regime. Therefore their area is enlarged by carbon fibre sheets. This increases the effectiveness of the flaps by a factor of four. The maximum flap deviation is 30 degrees.

Tailsitter’s flight management unit (FMU). Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

A Pixhawk PX4 Flight Management Unit (FMU) runs the onboard control loop that tracks the desired body rates using a rate gyroscope which is also provided by the FMU. Safety routines that switch off the actuators if the vehicle does not receive control commands anymore or if the battery voltage is too low are also implemented on the FMU.

The algorithm is presented in research paper “A Global Strategy for Tailsitter Hover Control”, submitted to International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR), 2015.

Researchers
Robin Ritz and Raffaello D’Andrea
Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich
Flying Machine Arena

Technical details
Frame: Robbe Mini Wing RC styrofoam airframe
Electronics: Pixhawk PX4 Flight Management Unit
Battery: Thunder Power RC G6 Pro Lite 25C LiPo 350mAh 2S
Motors: Hacker A05-13S
Motor controllers: ZTW Spider 12A ESCs with SimonK firmware
Propellers: 5×3 GWS EP-5030
Flap servos: MKS DS65K
Infrastructure: Flying Machine Arena

If you liked this article, you may also be interested in:

See all the latest robotics news on Robohub, or sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Google scraps initial ‘Project Wing’ plans for new secret design

Ben Fisher — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:26:17 +0000

The head of Google’s moonshot lab Google X has recently announced they have scrapped the initial ‘Project Wing‘ design that they have been testing in Australia. According to X lab Director Astro Teller, the old design was difficult to control and they are now working on a new design.

Some features from the initial design:

Project Wing had a wingspan of approximately 1.5m (4,9ft)
Propulsion was driven from four electrically-driven propellers
Total weight, including delivery payload, was approximately 10kg (22lb)
The aircraft weight was 8.5kg (18.7lb)
Payload 1.5kg (3.3lb)
The aircraft was capable of VTOL (vertical takeoff and landing)
The hybrid design used the rotors for VTOL and hovering but used the wing shape for forward flight to maximize range and efficiency
Payloads would be dispatched from the aircraft while in hover mode using a tether

It is understood that the team have been working on a new secret design since they started testing in Australia. This new design is said to move away from the single-wing approach. Google has been working on drones since 2011 so will surely have a number of different concept designs. However, the ‘Project Wing‘ design we reported on is the only one we’re aware of that made it to field testing. Teller explained that the design didn’t cope well in high winds and its cargo shifted too much when the wing moved up and down.

Former head of ‘Project Wing‘ Nicholas Roy has said that delivery drones “are absolutely viable, but there are a lot of technical hurdles that have to be crossed.” Nicholas Roy is a professor at the Massachusetts of Institute of Technology and says “we are very much in the prototype stage.”

Google are not the only ones looking at turning delivery drones into a reality. Amazon, DHL and Chinese giant Alibaba are all working on delivery drones. Some experts predict that there is another 5 years of development needed before we see large scale deployment.

If you liked this article, you may also be interested in:

See all the latest robotics news on Robohub, or sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Google’s secret drone delivery program

Frank Tobe — Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:14:00 +0000

The Atlantic revealed the inside story of Google’s two-year secret X-labs drone-delivery project in a detailed story by Alexis Madrigal. Project Wing, as the drone-delivery venture is called, has already conducted test flights delivering small packages to rural areas of Australia. Watch the Google promo video:

The Atlantic article describes how the present form of drone came to be a tail sitter, i.e., a hybrid of plane and helicopter, which takes off vertically but flies horizontally.

After observing some users attempting to grab the package before it was actually delivered, Google decided for safety reasons to winch the package down to the ground instead of flying down and placing the package there when making a delivery. Thus the drone hovers in a vertical position and winches down the package on a tether line, which also contains an “egg” of electronics. The egg detects when (or if) the package has reached the ground, electronically detaches, and instructs the vehicle to haul up the tether.

Dave Vos, an experienced unmanned aerial and marine systems engineer, is heading up Project Wing for Google. According to the Atlantic story, there are already dozens of people working on various aspects of the project: delivery mechanism, user experience, the app for ordering up the drones, etc. The article didn’t mention where the product that was being delivered came from or how the recipient ordered and paid for that product. That’s another secret waiting to be discovered.

Perhaps the most interesting statement from the article was this:

Of course Google wants the world to believe in delivery by drone as part of the natural progression of a technological society to deliver things faster and faster. This is how the world works.

Take that, Amazon!