Robohub.org
 

Social learning

by
29 August 2010



share this:

Robots are portrayed as tomorrows helpers, be it in schools, hospitals, workplaces or homes. Unfortunately, such robots won’t be truly useful out-of-the-box because of the complexity of real-world environments and tasks. Instead, they will need to learn how to interact with objects in their environment to produce a desired outcome (affordance learning).

For this purpose, robots can explore the world while using machine learning techniques to update their knowledge. However, the learning process is sometimes saturated with examples of objects, actions and effects that won’t help the robot in its purpose.

In these cases, humans or other social partners can help direct robot learning (social learning). Most studies have focussed on scenarios where a teacher demonstrates how to correctly do a task. The robot then imitates the teacher by reproducing the same actions to achieve the same goals.

This approach, while being very efficient, typically means that the teacher needs to take time to train the robot, which can be burdensome. Furthermore, the robot might be so specialized for the demonstrated scenario that it will have trouble performing tasks that slightly differ. In addition, imitation only works when the teacher and robot have similar motion constraints and morphologies.

Luckily, humans and animals use a large variety of mechanisms to learn from social partners. Tapping into this reservoir, Cakmak et al. propose mechanisms where:
– robots interact with the same objects as the social partner (stimulus enhancement)
– robots try to achieve the same effect on the same object as the social partner (emulation)
– robots reproduce the same action as the social partner (mimicking)

Experiments performed in simulation compare stimulus enhancement, emulation, mimicking, imitation and non-social learning in a large variety of situations. The results summarize which mechanisms are better suited for which scenarios in a series of very useful guidelines. Demonstrations with two robots, Jimmy and Jane, were done to validate the study. Don’t miss the excellent video below for a summary of the article.

In the future, Cakmak et al. will focus on combining learning approaches to harness the full potential of this rich set of mechanisms.



tags:


Sabine Hauert is President of Robohub and Associate Professor at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory
Sabine Hauert is President of Robohub and Associate Professor at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory





Related posts :



#RoboCup2024 – daily digest: 21 July

In the last of our digests, we report on the closing day of competitions in Eindhoven.
21 July 2024, by and

#RoboCup2024 – daily digest: 20 July

In the second of our daily round-ups, we bring you a taste of the action from Eindhoven.
20 July 2024, by and

#RoboCup2024 – daily digest: 19 July

Welcome to the first of our daily round-ups from RoboCup2024 in Eindhoven.
19 July 2024, by and

Robot Talk Episode 90 – Robotically Augmented People

In this special live recording at the Victoria and Albert Museum, Claire chatted to Milia Helena Hasbani, Benjamin Metcalfe, and Dani Clode about robotic prosthetics and human augmentation.
21 June 2024, by

Robot Talk Episode 89 – Simone Schuerle

In the latest episode of the Robot Talk podcast, Claire chatted to Simone Schuerle from ETH Zürich all about microrobots, medicine and science.
14 June 2024, by

Robot Talk Episode 88 – Lord Ara Darzi

In the latest episode of the Robot Talk podcast, Claire chatted to Lord Ara Darzi from Imperial College London all about robotic surgery - past, present and future.
07 June 2024, by





Robohub is supported by:




Would you like to learn how to tell impactful stories about your robot or AI system?


scicomm
training the next generation of science communicators in robotics & AI


©2024 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence


 












©2021 - ROBOTS Association