Robohub.org
 

The application of ‘elegance’ to machine behavior


by
30 January 2010



share this:

We all have some idea of what elegance means, whether our notion of it is tied up with silky evening dresses, polished wood and brass, chandeliers and stained glass windows, exotic carpets, and expensive sports cars, or with youthful bodies that are tanned and fit, knowing the local language well enough to use it sparingly with assurance, being appropriately dressed for the weather, good posture, fluid movement, a varied diet of moderate proportions, giving every task as much time as it requires, and so on.

 

Applying the notion of elegance to machine behavior may resonate for some and not for others. What could it possibly mean, elegant machine behavior, wouldn’t that be a contradiction in terms?

 

In this piece on another blog, I suggest that Apple should get into robotics, partly because to fail to do so would be to leave the largest looming growth market to others, and partly because I believe the company has something to contribute, something relating to elegance. I think Apple would set a high standard for machine behavior, and then exceed it, providing a tangible example of first-order elegance.

 

I say “first-order elegance” to suggest that there is also a “second-order” or “meta-elegance” that looks beyond present behavior to its ultimate effects. For example, formality may appear elegant, but if children are subjected to it all the time they may fail to develop emotional intelligence, an inelegant result.

 

As applied here, it is second-order or meta-elegance that is more important. It matters far less whether machines that tend land appear deft in their actions than whether the result of those actions appears more garden or desert-like. That’s not to say that first-order elegance is unimportant. Efficient movement, of the entire machine and of its parts, is an important aspect of cost-effectiveness, but efficiently producing a undesirable result gains nothing.

 

I believe that second-order elegance is achievable in this context, that machines can be programmed to understand complex living systems and nurture them, while raising food and fiber for market in their midst. If I didn’t believe that I would never have bothered trying to explain this vision of a greener future founded on robotics.

 

Reposted from Cultibotics.



tags: ,


John Payne

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to Robohub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

Robot Talk Episode 163 – Robots helping people, with Aaron Edsinger

  25 Sep 2026
In the first episode of Robot Talk season 7, Claire chatted to Aaron Edsinger from Hello Robot about their Stretch robots that can help people with mobility issues live more independently.

An open source approach to physical AI from Intrinsic

  25 Sep 2026
Find out more about the capabilities of Intrinsic Core.

What’s coming up at #IROS2026?

  24 Sep 2026
Find out what the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems has in store.

Robotics roadmaps from around the world spotlight of the month: China

China is targeting the next industrial revolution by doubling down on embodied AI and humanoid robotics, building directly on its vast manufacturing infrastructure.

Mars rovers give scientists a ground-level view of the red planet – peek inside their NASA control room

  21 Sep 2026
NASA created Curiosity to search for evidence of ancient habitable environments.

Reimagining robotics for sustainability

  18 Sep 2026
"Our ambition is not to simply make robots more sustainable; they must actively contribute to solving sustainability challenges."

Watch the ICRA keynote and plenary talks

  16 Sep 2026
If you missed the conference you can catch up on IEEE TV.


↑


AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to Robohub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence