Robohub.org
 

Integrating path planning and robot control


by
07 March 2011



share this:

There is often a conflict between planning the path a robot should take to achieve a desired task (high-level control) and the motion control needed for the robot to follow this path (low-level control). The problem is that if you decouple the path planning from the robot control, you might end up with paths that are impossible for the robot to follow because of physical constraints. Fully coupling the high-level and low-level control would solve this problem, although such intricate controllers are typically difficult to design.

To solve these shortcomings, Conner et al. propose a hybrid control strategy that combines low-level and high-level control in a smart way. As a test case, they consider a scenario where a robot needs to reach a goal while avoiding obstacles. The robot has a non-trivial body shape and is nonholonomic, meaning that it can not turn on the spot. The approach they developed is shown in the figure below. Local control policies, showed by fennel-shapped sets with vector field arrows, are responsible for making the robot drive towards a local goal. These policies respect the low-level dynamics and kinematics of the robot. A set of control policies can then be followed sequentially to reach a desired high-level behavior. To find the best path, an abstract tree representing the transitions between control policies is used.

Experiments were done with a LAGR robot in a fully known environment and with visual localization using landmarks. Results show that the method is successful in safely guiding the nonholonomic robot to its goal in an obstacle prone environment and that disturbances do not require the robot to replan its course.




Sabine Hauert is President of Robohub and Associate Professor at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory
Sabine Hauert is President of Robohub and Associate Professor at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to Robohub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

Robot Talk Episode 167 – Automating construction, with Jan Petrš

  23 Oct 2026
In the latest episode of the Robot Talk podcast, Claire chatted to Jan Petrš from École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne about novel robot designs for construction and architecture.

ACM SIGAI Autonomous Agents Award 2027 open for nominations

  20 Oct 2026
Nominations are solicited for the 2027 ACM SIGAI Autonomous Agents Research Award.

Powered by muscle cells, a paper-thin robot swims through watery maze

  19 Oct 2026
MIT engineers’ new aquabot offers a way to design small, efficient “biohybrid” robots.

Robot Talk Episode 166 – Evolving robot bodies and brains, with Rika Antonova

  16 Oct 2026
In the latest episode of the Robot Talk podcast, Claire chatted to Rika Antonova from the University of Cambridge about using artificial intelligence to develop complimentary robot hardware and algorithms.

Humanoid robots can sprint and box – but the real test is doing the laundry

  12 Oct 2026
No robot system can yet reliably handle the whole laundry process. Even folding remains a challenge.

Robot Talk Episode 165 – Robots behind the research, with Kushant Patel

  09 Oct 2026
In the latest episode of the Robot Talk podcast, Claire chatted to Kushant Patel from Brookhaven National Laboratory about robots that work in scientific facilities, such as particle accelerators.

What three days building a robot taught me

and   07 Oct 2026
The brief sounded simple: build a small autonomous robot, then make it survive increasingly difficult mazes. Simple... right? Until you actually have to build one.


↑


AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to Robohub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence