Robots need our quantified trust and they don’t have it | Inverse

by Alex Kirkpatrick

21 January 2017

share this:

Right now, DARPA is developing robots capable of rescuing humans from burning buildings even if that means knocking down walls and wading through flames. These potential savior-bots are evaluated on an obstacle course designed to test their speed, stability, versatility, and more. They’re getting better, stronger, and faster. But what will panicked people think when a machine crashes into their smoke-filled living room? Will these robots alleviate or compound the terror? Understanding the correlation between effectiveness and trust is profoundly difficult when it comes to robot-human interaction…

Click here to read more.

Alex Kirkpatrick is a passionate writer and science communicator...

Robots need our quantified trust and they don’t have it | Inverse

Related posts :

Engineering fantasy into reality

RoboCup@Work League: Interview with Christoph Steup

Interview with Haimin Hu: Game-theoretic integration of safety, interaction and learning for human-centered autonomy

AIhub coffee corner: Agentic AI

Interview with Kate Candon: Leveraging explicit and implicit feedback in human-robot interactions

#RoboCup2025: social media round-up part 2

#RoboCup2025: social media round-up 1

Livestream of RoboCup2025

↑

Would you like to learn how to tell impactful stories about your robot or AI system?