Robohub.org
 

‘IDSC Tailsitter’ flying robot performs vertical loops and easily transitions between hover and forward flight


by
28 July 2016



share this:
Image credit: Robin Ritz

Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

The IDSC Tailsitter has been designed at the Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich, as a testbed for novel control algorithms for tailsitter vehicles. The goal of the project is to develop controllers that enable agile and robust flight for all flight regimes, such that the full potential of these vehicles can be exploited.

Airframe based on a Clark Y profile. Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

Airframe based on a Clark Y profile. Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

The airframe of the vehicle is based on a Clark Y profile and designed such that for regular flight the pitching moment vanishes for zero flap angle, and such that the aerodynamic neutral point coincides with the vehicle’s center of gravity. The objective of this design is to allow agile maneuvers for all flight regimes and to avoid flap angle saturation problems caused by large trim angles.

Internal structure. Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

Internal structure. Source: Robin Ritz, Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zurich.

The internal structure of the vehicle is built upon a core of a carbon sandwich composite material. The motors and servos are attached to the core using 3D-printed mountings, where the servos are placed such that they can be directly connected to the flaps. Further, a set of wing profile ribs and two carbon fiber tubes on the side for protection are mounted to the core structure. The electronics are placed at the center of the vehicle, and the battery at the front such that the center of gravity is at the desired position. All parts of the vehicle are screwed together (no glue is used), in order to simplify the replacement of broken components. The tailsitter’s wingspan is 48cm and the total weight is 150g.

The vehicle is controlled by a global controller enabling recovery to hover from any initial condition. A cascaded control architecture is used: Based on position and velocity errors an outer control loop computes a desired attitude keeping the vehicle in coordinated flight, while an inner control loop tracks the desired attitude using a lookup table with precomputed optimal attitude trajectories. The controller runs with an update rate of 500Hz on a Cortex M4F microprocessor. The vehicle is able to communicate with a ground station using an nRF51822 chip from the company Nordic Semiconductor. Communication can be established for recording telemetry data or for sending high-level commands to the vehicle, such as “take-off” or “land”. However, the vehicle is able to fly autonomously, the trajectories that are being tracked are stored on-board.

The on-board state estimation algorithms and technology are provided by the ETH spin-off company Verity Studios.

The attitude control algorithm is presented in the research paper “A Global Strategy for Tailsitter Hover Control”, International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR), 2015.

Researchers

Robin Ritz and Raffaello D’Andrea
Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control (IDSC), ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Flying Machine Arena

Technical details

Airframe: Custom design based on a Clark Y profile
Electronics: Custom design using a Cortex M4F microprocessor
Battery: Thunder Power RC G8 Pro Lite 25C LiPo 480mAh 2S
Motors: Hacker A05-13S
Motor controllers: Dys SN20A Mini ESCs with SimonK firmware
Propellers: 5×3 GWS EP-5030
Flap servos: MKS DS65K
Infrastructure: Flying Machine Arena


If you enjoyed this article, you may also want to read:

See all the latest robotics news on Robohub, or sign up for our weekly newsletter.



tags: , , , ,


Robin Ritz is a doctoral candidate at ETH Zurich.
Robin Ritz is a doctoral candidate at ETH Zurich.


Subscribe to Robohub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

Resource-constrained image generation and visual understanding: an interview with Aniket Roy

  07 Apr 2026
Aniket tells us about his research exploring how modern generative models can be adapted to operate efficiently while maintaining strong performance.

Back to school: robots learn from factory workers

  02 Apr 2026
A Czech startup is making factory automation easier by letting workers teach robots new tasks through simple demonstrations instead of complex coding.

Resource-sharing boosts robotic resilience

  31 Mar 2026
When a modular robot shares power, sensing, and communication resources among its individual units, it is significantly more resistant to failure than traditional robotic systems.

Robot Talk Episode 150 – House building robots, with Vikas Enti

  27 Mar 2026
In the latest episode of the Robot Talk podcast, Claire chatted to Vikas Enti from Reframe Systems about using robotics and automation to build climate-resilient, high-performance homes.

A history of RoboCup with Manuela Veloso

and   24 Mar 2026
Find out how RoboCup got started and how the competition has evolved, from one of the co-founders.

Robot Talk Episode 149 – Robot safety and security, with Krystal Mattich

  20 Mar 2026
In the latest episode of the Robot Talk podcast, Claire chatted to Krystal Mattich from Brain Corp about trustworthy autonomous robots in public spaces.

A multi-armed robot for assisting with agricultural tasks

  18 Mar 2026
How can a robot safely manipulate branches to reveal hidden flowers while remaining aware of interaction forces and minimizing damage?

Graphene-based sensor to improve robot touch

  16 Mar 2026
Multiscale-structured miniaturized 3D force sensors for improved robot touch.



Robohub is supported by:


Subscribe to Robohub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.02 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence